The logic for calculating the input rate used when figuring out
the proper dynamic steps for pllx was incorrect. It is supposed to
be calculated using parent_rate / m but it was just using the parent
rate directly, therefore using the wrong step values.
Signed-off-by: Rhyland Klein <rklein@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/clk/tegra/clk-tegra210.c | 10 +++++-----
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/clk/tegra/clk-tegra210.c b/drivers/clk/tegra/clk-tegra210.c
index 2a7faa357130..5d8fac7052f2 100644
--- a/drivers/clk/tegra/clk-tegra210.c
+++ b/drivers/clk/tegra/clk-tegra210.c
@@ -780,13 +780,13 @@ static void pllx_get_dyn_steps(struct clk_hw *hw, u32 *step_a, u32 *step_b)
{
unsigned long input_rate;
- if (!IS_ERR_OR_NULL(hw->clk)) {
+ /* cf rate */
+ if (!IS_ERR_OR_NULL(hw->clk))
input_rate = clk_hw_get_rate(clk_hw_get_parent(hw));
- /* cf rate */
- input_rate /= tegra_pll_get_fixed_mdiv(hw, input_rate);
- } else {
+ else
input_rate = 38400000;
- }
+
+ input_rate /= tegra_pll_get_fixed_mdiv(hw, input_rate);
switch (input_rate) {
case 12000000:
--
1.9.1
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-tegra" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
