This driver is the only one that calls regulator_sync_voltage(), but it can currently be built with CONFIG_REGULATOR disabled, producing this build error: drivers/cpufreq/tegra124-cpufreq.c: In function 'tegra124_cpu_switch_to_pllx': drivers/cpufreq/tegra124-cpufreq.c:68:2: error: implicit declaration of function 'regulator_sync_voltage' [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration] regulator_sync_voltage(priv->vdd_cpu_reg); My first attempt was to implement a helper for this function for regulator_sync_voltage, but Mark Brown explained: We don't do this for *all* regulator API functions - there's some where using them strongly suggests that there is actually a dependency on the regulator API. This does seem like it might be falling into the specialist category [...] Looking at the code I'm pretty unclear on what the authors think the use of _sync_voltage() is doing in the first place so it may be even better to just remove the call. It seems to have been included in the first commit so there's not changelog explaining things and there's no comment either. I'd *expect* it to be a noop as far as I can see. This adds the dependency to make the driver always build successfully or not be enabled at all. Alternatively, we could investigate if the driver should stop calling regulator_sync_voltage instead. Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxx> diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/Kconfig.arm b/drivers/cpufreq/Kconfig.arm index 235a1ba73d92..b1f8a73e5a94 100644 --- a/drivers/cpufreq/Kconfig.arm +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/Kconfig.arm @@ -226,7 +226,7 @@ config ARM_TEGRA20_CPUFREQ config ARM_TEGRA124_CPUFREQ tristate "Tegra124 CPUFreq support" - depends on ARCH_TEGRA && CPUFREQ_DT + depends on ARCH_TEGRA && CPUFREQ_DT && REGULATOR default y help This adds the CPUFreq driver support for Tegra124 SOCs. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-tegra" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
