On Wed, Dec 02, 2015 at 02:35:20AM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > On Tuesday, December 01, 2015 05:18:09 PM Thierry Reding wrote: > > > > [cut] > > > > > That all sounds very complicated for little gain. Disabling PM doesn't > > make much sense these days, so I'd personally be fine to unconditonally > > enable PM on Tegra. I'm not sure what the correct way would be. Since > > the PM symbol is user-visible, selecting it doesn't sound like a very > > good solution, though a quick grep shows that some architectures do > > this. > > > > Rafael, do you know what the canonical way is to make !PM invalid for a > > platform? > > Well, good question. > > I can't really suggest anything cleaner than selecting it from the top-level > Kconfig at the moment. Alright, sounds like something we should do. Thanks, Thierry
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
