On 2015-10-06 16:18:58 [+0100], Will Deacon wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 06, 2015 at 10:11:24AM +0200, Thierry Reding wrote:
> > On Wed, Sep 23, 2015 at 08:39:43AM +0200, Jan Kiszka wrote:
> > > Ensure that we can use psci_smp_available without checking for
> > > CONFIG_SMP first.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > ---
> > > arch/arm/include/asm/psci.h | 2 +-
> > > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/arch/arm/include/asm/psci.h b/arch/arm/include/asm/psci.h
> > > index 68ee3ce..ff956f4 100644
> > > --- a/arch/arm/include/asm/psci.h
> > > +++ b/arch/arm/include/asm/psci.h
> > > @@ -16,7 +16,7 @@
> > >
> > > extern struct smp_operations psci_smp_ops;
> > >
> > > -#ifdef CONFIG_ARM_PSCI
> > > +#if defined(CONFIG_ARM_PSCI) && defined(CONFIG_SMP)
> > > bool psci_smp_available(void);
> > > #else
> > > static inline bool psci_smp_available(void) { return false; }
>
> Sure, I'm fine with this patch in isolation, I just didn't (don't) fully
> grok what the series is trying to achieve.
Will, do you want this patch re-sent or do you just need some time to pick
it up?
> Will
Sebastian
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-tegra" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
