On Mon, Jul 13, 2015 at 01:39:46PM +0100, Jon Hunter wrote:
> The following clean-ups have been made to the PMC code:
>
> 1. Add a macro for determining the state of a PMC powergate
> 2. Use the readx_poll_timeout() function instead of implementing a local
> polling loop with a timeout.
> 3. Use a case-statement in the function that removes the powergate clamp
> instead of multiple if-statements to improve readability.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jon Hunter <jonathanh@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> drivers/soc/tegra/pmc.c | 72 ++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------------------
> 1 file changed, 35 insertions(+), 37 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/soc/tegra/pmc.c b/drivers/soc/tegra/pmc.c
> index c0635bdd4ee3..180d434deec5 100644
> --- a/drivers/soc/tegra/pmc.c
> +++ b/drivers/soc/tegra/pmc.c
> @@ -28,6 +28,7 @@
> #include <linux/export.h>
> #include <linux/init.h>
> #include <linux/io.h>
> +#include <linux/iopoll.h>
> #include <linux/of.h>
> #include <linux/of_address.h>
> #include <linux/platform_device.h>
> @@ -56,6 +57,8 @@
> #define PWRGATE_TOGGLE_START (1 << 8)
>
> #define REMOVE_CLAMPING 0x34
> +#define REMOVE_CLAMPING_VDEC (1 << 3)
> +#define REMOVE_CLAMPING_PCIE (1 << 4)
>
> #define PWRGATE_STATUS 0x38
>
> @@ -101,6 +104,8 @@
>
> #define GPU_RG_CNTRL 0x2d4
>
> +#define PMC_PWRGATE_STATE(val, id) (!!(val & BIT(id)))
I find double-negations very difficult to read. ((value & BIT(id)) != 0)
is clearer in my opinion. Also I'd suggest status or value as the first
parameter name, for consistency with other parts of the driver.
> +
> struct tegra_pmc_soc {
> unsigned int num_powergates;
> const char *const *powergates;
> @@ -177,15 +182,14 @@ static void tegra_pmc_writel(u32 value, unsigned long offset)
> */
> static int tegra_powergate_set(int id, bool new_state, bool wait)
> {
> - unsigned long timeout;
> - bool status;
> int ret = 0;
> + u32 val;
>
> mutex_lock(&pmc->powergates_lock);
>
> - status = tegra_pmc_readl(PWRGATE_STATUS) & (1 << id);
> + val = tegra_pmc_readl(PWRGATE_STATUS);
>
> - if (status == new_state) {
> + if (PMC_PWRGATE_STATE(val, id) == new_state) {
> mutex_unlock(&pmc->powergates_lock);
> return 0;
> }
> @@ -193,17 +197,9 @@ static int tegra_powergate_set(int id, bool new_state, bool wait)
> tegra_pmc_writel(PWRGATE_TOGGLE_START | id, PWRGATE_TOGGLE);
>
> if (wait) {
> - timeout = jiffies + msecs_to_jiffies(100);
> - ret = -ETIMEDOUT;
> -
> - while (time_before(jiffies, timeout)) {
> - status = !!(tegra_pmc_readl(PWRGATE_STATUS) & BIT(id));
> - if (status == new_state) {
> - ret = 0;
> - break;
> - }
> - udelay(10);
> - }
> + ret = readx_poll_timeout(tegra_pmc_readl, PWRGATE_STATUS,
> + val, PMC_PWRGATE_STATE(val, id) == new_state,
> + 10, 100000);
> }
>
> mutex_unlock(&pmc->powergates_lock);
> @@ -242,13 +238,10 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(tegra_powergate_power_off);
> */
> int tegra_powergate_is_powered(int id)
> {
> - u32 status;
> -
> if (!pmc->soc || id < 0 || id >= pmc->soc->num_powergates)
> return -EINVAL;
>
> - status = tegra_pmc_readl(PWRGATE_STATUS) & (1 << id);
> - return !!status;
> + return PMC_PWRGATE_STATE(tegra_pmc_readl(PWRGATE_STATUS), id);
I'd prefer to keep the two steps here. As a general rule I try never to
mix reading or writing a register with other code on the same line.
> }
>
> /**
> @@ -257,34 +250,39 @@ int tegra_powergate_is_powered(int id)
> */
> int tegra_powergate_remove_clamping(int id)
> {
> - u32 mask;
> + u32 val, reg;
Side note: Please use value instead of val since that's the form used
elsewhere in the driver. Also reg would be more appropriately called
offset or similar because that's what it really is. It would also be
more naturally an unsized type, such as unsigned int. But...
>
> if (!pmc->soc || id < 0 || id >= pmc->soc->num_powergates)
> return -EINVAL;
>
> /*
> - * On Tegra124 and later, the clamps for the GPU are controlled by a
> - * separate register (with different semantics).
> + * In most cases the bit for removing the IO clamping is the same as
> + * the powergate partition ID, however, this is not always the case.
> + * Furthermore, on Tegra124 and later, the clamps for the GPU are
> + * controlled by a separate register (with different semantics). The
> + * following case-statement handles these exceptions.
> */
> - if (id == TEGRA_POWERGATE_3D) {
> + val = 1 << id;
> + reg = REMOVE_CLAMPING;
> +
> + switch (id) {
> + case TEGRA_POWERGATE_3D:
> if (pmc->soc->has_gpu_clamps) {
> - tegra_pmc_writel(0, GPU_RG_CNTRL);
> - return 0;
> + val = 0;
> + reg = GPU_RG_CNTRL;
> }
> + break;
> + case TEGRA_POWERGATE_VDEC:
> + val = REMOVE_CLAMPING_VDEC;
> + break;
> + case TEGRA_POWERGATE_PCIE:
> + val = REMOVE_CLAMPING_PCIE;
> + break;
> + default:
> + break;
> }
>
> - /*
> - * Tegra 2 has a bug where PCIE and VDE clamping masks are
> - * swapped relatively to the partition ids
> - */
> - if (id == TEGRA_POWERGATE_VDEC)
> - mask = (1 << TEGRA_POWERGATE_PCIE);
> - else if (id == TEGRA_POWERGATE_PCIE)
> - mask = (1 << TEGRA_POWERGATE_VDEC);
> - else
> - mask = (1 << id);
> -
> - tegra_pmc_writel(mask, REMOVE_CLAMPING);
> + tegra_pmc_writel(val, reg);
... to be honest, I think the previous code was more straightforward, so
I'd prefer if you dropped this particular hunk.
Thierry
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
