On Wed, Jul 1, 2015 at 7:45 AM, Tomeu Vizoso <tomeu.vizoso@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > When an OF node has a pin range for its GPIOs, return -EPROBE_DEFER if > the pin controller isn't available. > > Otherwise, the GPIO range wouldn't be set at all unless the pin > controller probed always before the GPIO chip. > > With this change, the probe of the GPIO chip will be deferred and will > be retried at a later point, hopefully once the pin controller has been > registered and probed already. This will break cases where the pinctrl driver does not exist, but the DT contains pinctrl bindings. We can have similar problems already with clocks though. However, IMO this problem is a bit different in that pinctrl is more likely entirely optional while clocks are often required. You may do all pin setup in bootloader/firmware on some boards and not others. Of course then why put pinctrl in the DT in that case? They could be present just due to how chip vs. board dts files are structured. We could address this by simply marking the pin controller node disabled. However, ... > @@ -361,7 +361,7 @@ static void of_gpiochip_add_pin_range(struct gpio_chip *chip) > > pctldev = of_pinctrl_get(pinspec.np); > if (!pctldev) > - break; > + return -EPROBE_DEFER; But you cannot distinguish that case here. I think of_pinctrl_get needs to set the error code appropriately. Rob -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-tegra" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
