Re: [PATCH v6 03/15] soc/tegra: Add ram code reader helper

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 03/02/2015 10:46 AM, Alexandre Courbot wrote:
On Thu, Feb 12, 2015 at 11:06 PM, Tomeu Vizoso
<tomeu.vizoso@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
From: Mikko Perttunen <mperttunen@xxxxxxxxxx>

Needed for the EMC and MC drivers to know what timings from the DT to use.

Signed-off-by: Mikko Perttunen <mperttunen@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Tomeu Vizoso <tomeu.vizoso@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>

---

v4: Replace magic number with PMC_STRAPPING_OPT_A_RAM_CODE_SHIFT
---
  drivers/soc/tegra/fuse/tegra-apbmisc.c | 19 +++++++++++++++++++
  include/soc/tegra/fuse.h               |  1 +
  2 files changed, 20 insertions(+)

diff --git a/drivers/soc/tegra/fuse/tegra-apbmisc.c b/drivers/soc/tegra/fuse/tegra-apbmisc.c
index 3bf5aba..dc96a62 100644
--- a/drivers/soc/tegra/fuse/tegra-apbmisc.c
+++ b/drivers/soc/tegra/fuse/tegra-apbmisc.c
@@ -28,8 +28,13 @@
  #define APBMISC_SIZE   0x64
  #define FUSE_SKU_INFO  0x10

+#define PMC_STRAPPING_OPT_A_RAM_CODE_SHIFT     4
+#define PMC_STRAPPING_OPT_A_RAM_CODE_MASK_LONG (0xf << PMC_STRAPPING_OPT_A_RAM_CODE_SHIFT)
+#define PMC_STRAPPING_OPT_A_RAM_CODE_MASK_SHORT        (0x3 << PMC_STRAPPING_OPT_A_RAM_CODE_SHIFT)

I think you are slightly over 80 chars here.

+
  static void __iomem *apbmisc_base;
  static void __iomem *strapping_base;
+static bool          long_ram_code;

  u32 tegra_read_chipid(void)
  {
@@ -54,6 +59,18 @@ u32 tegra_read_straps(void)
                 return 0;
  }

+u32 tegra_read_ram_code(void)
+{
+       u32 straps = tegra_read_straps();
+
+       if (long_ram_code)
+               straps &= PMC_STRAPPING_OPT_A_RAM_CODE_MASK_LONG;
+       else
+               straps &= PMC_STRAPPING_OPT_A_RAM_CODE_MASK_SHORT;
+
+       return straps >> PMC_STRAPPING_OPT_A_RAM_CODE_SHIFT;
+}
+
  static const struct of_device_id apbmisc_match[] __initconst = {
         { .compatible = "nvidia,tegra20-apbmisc", },
         {},
@@ -112,4 +129,6 @@ void __init tegra_init_apbmisc(void)
         strapping_base = of_iomap(np, 1);
         if (!strapping_base)
                 pr_err("ioremap tegra strapping_base failed\n");
+
+       long_ram_code = of_property_read_bool(np, "nvidia,long-ram-code");

Is this long-ram property chip-dependent? If so, couldn't we just use
the chip ID or matched compatible string to decide whether the RAM
code length, instead of having a dedicated property for it?


I am under the impression that it is board-specific.

Mikko

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-tegra" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux ARM MSM]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux