Re: [RFC PATCH 3/9] memory: tegra: add flush operation for Tegra124 memory clients

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Jan 14, 2015 at 3:19 PM, Vince Hsu <vinceh@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Vince Hsu <vinceh@xxxxxxxxxx>

Please have a short commit message even if the subject seems to be
self-explanatory.

> ---
>  drivers/memory/tegra/tegra124.c | 108 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
>  1 file changed, 107 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/memory/tegra/tegra124.c b/drivers/memory/tegra/tegra124.c
> index 278d40b854c1..cce255d3df5c 100644
> --- a/drivers/memory/tegra/tegra124.c
> +++ b/drivers/memory/tegra/tegra124.c
> @@ -6,6 +6,8 @@
>   * published by the Free Software Foundation.
>   */
>
> +#include <linux/delay.h>
> +#include <linux/device.h>
>  #include <linux/of.h>
>  #include <linux/mm.h>
>
> @@ -15,7 +17,7 @@
>
>  #include "mc.h"
>
> -static const struct tegra_mc_client tegra124_mc_clients[] = {
> +static struct tegra_mc_client tegra124_mc_clients[] = {

This const drop also seems out-of-place. If they are needed at all,
please have them all done in the same patch, and only when they become
needed.

>         {
>                 .id = 0x00,
>                 .name = "ptcr",
> @@ -959,7 +961,108 @@ static const struct tegra_smmu_swgroup tegra124_swgroups[] = {
>         { .swgroup = TEGRA_SWGROUP_VI,        .reg = 0x280 },
>  };
>
> +static struct tegra_mc_hotreset tegra124_mc_hotreset[] = {
> +       {TEGRA_SWGROUP_AFI,        0x200, 0x204,  0},
> +       {TEGRA_SWGROUP_AVPC,       0x200, 0x204,  1},
> +       {TEGRA_SWGROUP_DC,         0x200, 0x204,  2},
> +       {TEGRA_SWGROUP_DCB,        0x200, 0x204,  3},
> +       {TEGRA_SWGROUP_HC,         0x200, 0x204,  6},
> +       {TEGRA_SWGROUP_HDA,        0x200, 0x204,  7},
> +       {TEGRA_SWGROUP_ISP2,       0x200, 0x204,  8},
> +       {TEGRA_SWGROUP_MPCORE,     0x200, 0x204,  9},
> +       {TEGRA_SWGROUP_MPCORELP,   0x200, 0x204, 10},
> +       {TEGRA_SWGROUP_MSENC,      0x200, 0x204, 11},
> +       {TEGRA_SWGROUP_PPCS,       0x200, 0x204, 14},
> +       {TEGRA_SWGROUP_SATA,       0x200, 0x204, 15},
> +       {TEGRA_SWGROUP_VDE,        0x200, 0x204, 16},
> +       {TEGRA_SWGROUP_VI,         0x200, 0x204, 17},
> +       {TEGRA_SWGROUP_VIC,        0x200, 0x204, 18},
> +       {TEGRA_SWGROUP_XUSB_HOST,  0x200, 0x204, 19},
> +       {TEGRA_SWGROUP_XUSB_DEV,   0x200, 0x204, 20},
> +       {TEGRA_SWGROUP_TSEC,       0x200, 0x204, 22},
> +       {TEGRA_SWGROUP_SDMMC1A,    0x200, 0x204, 29},
> +       {TEGRA_SWGROUP_SDMMC2A,    0x200, 0x204, 30},
> +       {TEGRA_SWGROUP_SDMMC3A,    0x200, 0x204, 31},
> +       {TEGRA_SWGROUP_SDMMC4A,    0x970, 0x974,  0},
> +       {TEGRA_SWGROUP_ISP2B,      0x970, 0x974,  1},
> +       {TEGRA_SWGROUP_GPU,        0x970, 0x974,  2},
> +};
> +
>  #ifdef CONFIG_ARCH_TEGRA_124_SOC
> +
> +static bool tegra124_stable_hotreset_check(struct tegra_mc *mc,
> +               u32 reg, u32 *stat)
> +{
> +       int i;
> +       u32 cur_stat;
> +       u32 prv_stat;
> +
> +       /*
> +        * There might be a glitch seen with the status register if we program
> +        * the control register and then read the status register in a short
> +        * window due to a HW bug. So here we poll for a stable status read.
> +        */
> +       prv_stat = mc_readl(mc, reg);
> +       for (i = 0; i < 5; i++) {

Why 5 times?

> +               cur_stat = mc_readl(mc, reg);
> +               if (cur_stat != prv_stat)
> +                       return false;
> +       }
> +       *stat = cur_stat;
> +       return true;
> +}
> +
> +static int tegra124_mc_flush(struct tegra_mc *mc,
> +               const struct tegra_mc_hotreset *hotreset)
> +{
> +       u32 val;
> +
> +       if (!mc || !hotreset)
> +               return -EINVAL;
> +
> +       /* XXX add mutex */

I guess this is a TODO for when this series exists the RFC state. :)

> +
> +       val = mc_readl(mc, hotreset->ctrl);
> +       val |= BIT(hotreset->bit);
> +       mc_writel(mc, val, hotreset->ctrl);
> +       mc_readl(mc, hotreset->ctrl);
> +
> +       /* poll till the flush is done */
> +       do {
> +               udelay(10);
> +               val = 0;
> +               if (!tegra124_stable_hotreset_check(mc, hotreset->status, &val))
> +                       continue;
> +       } while (!(val & BIT(hotreset->bit)));

So here you are waiting for the right bit in hotreset->status to turn
to 1. Why is the whole thing with tegra124_stable_hotreset_check()
needed? Could it switch from 1 to 0 to 1 again, with the first window
at 1 being invalid? In that case isn't there a risk that
tegra124_stable_hotreset_check() might do 5 consecutive reads on that
invalid state and let us continue before the flush is completed?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-tegra" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux ARM MSM]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux