On 01/16/2015 02:01 AM, Tomeu Vizoso wrote:
On 16 January 2015 at 09:50, Tomeu Vizoso <tomeu.vizoso@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On 15 January 2015 at 18:22, Stephen Warren <swarren@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On 01/15/2015 09:12 AM, Tomeu Vizoso wrote:
Patches are on its way to add a config file to alsaucm for the Nyan
boards. Use the same card ID that alsaucm will expect.
Signed-off-by: Tomeu Vizoso <tomeu.vizoso@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
arch/arm/boot/dts/tegra124-nyan-big.dts | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/tegra124-nyan-big.dts
b/arch/arm/boot/dts/tegra124-nyan-big.dts
index 43e58a4..9a9cffe 100644
--- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/tegra124-nyan-big.dts
+++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/tegra124-nyan-big.dts
@@ -1976,9 +1976,9 @@
};
sound {
- compatible = "nvidia,tegra-audio-max98090-nyan-big",
+ compatible = "nvidia,tegra-audio-max98090-nyan",
"nvidia,tegra-audio-max98090";
If all the boards that are derived from Nyan truly have identical audio HW
(or at least any differences can be described by this binding), then it
seems fine to add "nvidia,tegra-audio-max98090-nyan" to the compatible
value.
However, I don't see a reason to remove the board-specific compatible value
"nvidia,tegra-audio-max98090-nyan-big"; we should always include all the
values that are relevant.
Ok.
Oh, actually, my intention was to move the whole sound node to the
nyan dtsi, as there isn't anything specific to the blaze regarding
sound.
There are zero differences between the sound circuits of the boards? If
so, that sounds fine. I suppose if we do need to apply a quirk to one
board but not the other, we can always fall back on the top-level
compatible value if we absolutely have to.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-tegra" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
