On Fri, 9 Jan 2015, Stephen Warren wrote: > On 01/09/2015 01:52 PM, Paul Walmsley wrote: > > Hi Thierry > > > > On Fri, 9 Jan 2015, Thierry Reding wrote: > > > > > On Tue, Dec 16, 2014 at 12:38:29PM -0800, Paul Walmsley wrote: > > > > > > > > This patch is based on several patches from others: > > > > > > > > 1. a patch from Peter De Schrijver: > > > > > > > > http://lkml.iu.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/1407.1/06094.html > > > > > > > > 2. a patch from Bill Huang ("clk: tegra: enable cclk_g at boot on > > > > Tegra132"), and > > > > > > > > 3. a patch from Allen Martin ("clk: Enable tegra clock driver for > > > > tegra132"). > > > > > > Doesn't this technically require Signed-off-bys from each of the above, > > > then? > > > > I don't think so. Documentation/SubmittingPatches states: > > It's certainly been deemed acceptable in the past, if admittedly not optimal, > for the person who is the "exit point" of an organization/company for the > patch to be the only person to sign it off. The reason being they're vouching > that the Certificate of Origin applies to all the company-sponsored work > internal to the organization. I'm not even sure that applies to this patch. If I were passing along a verbatim copy of someone else's patch, or a copy with minor modifications, then it definitely be appropriate and expected to pass along their Signed-off-by:. But this patch is original work; it's not a verbatim copy of any of the patches that I mention above (which are all publicly available, incidentally). - Paul -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-tegra" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
