On Fri, Jan 09, 2015 at 02:38:39PM +0100, Daniel Lezcano wrote: > On 01/09/2015 02:33 PM, Thierry Reding wrote: > >On Fri, Jan 09, 2015 at 02:24:24PM +0100, Daniel Lezcano wrote: > >>On 01/09/2015 01:21 PM, Thierry Reding wrote: [...] > >>>How about we do something like the attached patch instead for now. That > >>>avoids any #ifdef'ery and still we don't attempt (and fail) to build the > >>>driver on 64-bit ARM. > >>> > >>>With that applied we can incrementally make the changes to untangle the > >>>ARM-specific parts and when the driver can build on 64-bit ARM we simply > >>>select TEGRA_TIMER via Kconfig. > >> > >>Yes, that is exactly what I was thinking about after sending the previous > >>email. And by this way, you also fixed the Kconfig option selection logic. > > > >Great. Will you give your Acked-by so that I can take that patch through > >the Tegra tree to resolve the build dependency? > > Acked-by: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@xxxxxxxxxx> Thanks, Thierry
Attachment:
pgpVrp9jBj0Is.pgp
Description: PGP signature
