On Thu, 23 Oct 2014, PERIER Romain wrote: > 2014-10-22 17:50 GMT+02:00 Lee Jones <lee.jones@xxxxxxxxxx>: > > On Wed, 22 Oct 2014, PERIER Romain wrote: > > > >> This is related to the following subject "[RFC v3 PATCH 1/5] of: Add > >> standard property for poweroff capability" and depends on the > >> corresponding patch. > > > > Then it should be sent in the same patch-set. > > > > There's nothing I can do with this patch as is. > > > > Even if this patch is already commited and present in "linux-next" ? > (or in Mark Brown's regulator tree) Usually it wouldn't be possible to take this, as it would be difficult to ensure bisectability. The way we usually deal with this is to have a shared immutable branch between the effected subsystems, but we can only do this if the patches are sent as a set. However, it appears as though Mark has "of: Add standard property for poweroff capability" on a tagged branch on its own. This means, after checking with Mark that this branch in indeed stable, I can merge it in and base this commit on top of it. Not many people setup their repos like Mark does, so I guess you are lucky this time. Once I've heard back from Mark, I'll let you know when I apply the patch. -- Lee Jones Linaro STMicroelectronics Landing Team Lead Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-tegra" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
