On 07/08/2014 07:43 AM, Peter De Schrijver wrote: > On Mon, Jul 07, 2014 at 02:44:17AM +0200, Olof Johansson wrote: >> On Mon, Jun 23, 2014 at 03:23:45PM -0600, Stephen Warren wrote: >>> This branch moves code related to the Tegra fuses out of arch/arm and >>> into a centralized location which could be shared with ARM64. It also >>> adds support for reading the fuse data through sysfs. >> >> The new/moved misc driver isn't acked by any misc maintainer, so I can't >> take this branch. >> >> I saw no indication from searching the mailing list of that either, >> so it wasn't just a missed acked-by. >> >> I wonder if this code should go under drivers/soc/ instead? > > It's modelled after sunxi_sid.c which lives in drivers/misc/eeprom/. > Originally this driver was also in drivers/misc/eeprom/, but Stephen objected > and therefore it was moved to drivers/misc/fuse. I think that's the right > place still. We anyway need this driver for sata and xhci. Sigh. This is exactly why (a) I suggested during that thread that the driver should be in drivers/soc not drivers/misc and (b) I sent the pull requests early enough so I could deal with any objections before my vacation:-( I wish people would just respond to my review comments by implementing them rather than persuading me to do the wrong thing. Since this is all a dependency for pretty much everything for Tegra for 3.17, I guess we should just drop all the Tegra pull requests for 3.17 and we'll have to redo all the patches for 3.18:-( But if Thierry can (or already has in another thread I haven't seen while on vacation) sort this out be redoing all the Tegra branches, that might be fine too. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-tegra" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
