On Wednesday 16 July 2014 17:14:29 Thierry Reding wrote: > > > > Ok, I'll have a look. I think when this becomes a separate driver, it > > should also have its own header file, so maybe you can in the meantime > > make it a local header file in mach-tegra until we have found a good > > place for it. > > Why do you think it should be a separate header? We already have a > couple in include/linux and I'm not sure it's useful to add even more. > If anything I would've thought it made sense to move the content of the > other headers into tegra-soc.h. I very much dislike the idea of having a per-vendor header file that everything gets crammed into. We should try to have proper subsystems and generic interfaces for these wherever possible. Arnd -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-tegra" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
