On 07/01/2014 04:50 AM, Catalin Marinas wrote: > On Mon, Jun 30, 2014 at 08:36:36PM +0100, Thierry Reding wrote: >> On Mon, Jun 30, 2014 at 02:16:34PM +0100, Lorenzo Pieralisi wrote: >>> And I think that most of the early bring up issues are just related to >>> powering-up/resetting a cpu for it to be booted, probably that's the >>> abstraction we should be focusing on, because it should just require poking >>> a bunch of registers to kickstart a CPU, no more than that, FW should be >>> able to deal with that and that's yet another reason behind PSCI design. >> >> Right, I agree that if we can push that into PSCI that would be great >> (provided there's an open-source implementation of PSCI). > > At least one (BSD-style license): > > https://github.com/ARM-software/arm-trusted-firmware > > There are also some patches for U-Boot (only covering secondary CPU > booting for now and not merged yet). Are the U-Boot patches: a) Patches to make U-Boot provide a PSCI implementation. b) Patches to make U-Boot use PSCI as a client. If you have a link or patch subject to search for, that'd be interesting. Thanks. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-tegra" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
