On 25 June 2014 20:23, Mike Turquette <mturquette@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Peter, > > Just FYI, I'm trying to reverse the trend of prepending double > underscores for functions that are used by clock providers. That stuff > started out small and sort of grew out of control ;-) I'm looking at rebasing Rabin's patches for per-user clks, and I have had to add a few variants for providers, so they can be called with clk_core instead. Have been prepending underscores for those internal variants, but in some cases I had to also append a _internal suffix because there were already variants without locking. What convention were you thinking of for distinguishing provider-only variants for e.g. clk_set_rate? Regards, Tomeu -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-tegra" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
