On 05/28/2014 08:49 AM, Thierry Reding wrote: > From: Thierry Reding <treding@xxxxxxxxxx> > > The current device tree binding for the regulator setup on Tegra PCIe is > not accurate. While it does work for current use-cases, that's likely by > accident rather than design. This series replaces the existing set of > power-supply properties with a new set that accurately describes the > inputs of the IP block (depending on SoC generation). > > As a heads-up, this breaks backwards compatibility with prior versions > of the device tree bindings, but I don't see a reason why that should > keep us from fixing this properly. Not many people are currently using > these bindings and those who are are most likely tracking upstream > development closely enough not to be impacted by this. > > I've aimed to keep the series bisectible, which has the downside of > interleaving patches to unrelated trees (ARM and PCI). I'm hoping that > perhaps we can find a way to merge this as a whole to keep it possible > to bisect across the series. Although again, I guess it wouldn't be all > that bad if that wasn't the case, given how little PCIe is actually > being used. > > This second version of the series has Bjorn's Acked-by for patch 3 from > the RFC. Stephen, it would be great if you can take this through the > Tegra tree so that the bisectability can be preserved. I have a bunch of > other smaller changes for the PCIe driver (mostly cleanups). I don't > think any of them will conflict, but for extra safety Bjorn may want to > pull this as a stable branch into his tree. I've applied this series to Tegra's for-3.17/pcie-regulators branch. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-tegra" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
