On Mon, May 19, 2014 at 6:31 PM, Lucas Stach <l.stach@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Am Montag, den 19.05.2014, 16:10 +0900 schrieb Alexandre Courbot:
>> From: Lucas Stach <dev@xxxxxxxxxx>
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Lucas Stach <dev@xxxxxxxxxx>
>> [acourbot@xxxxxxxxxx: make conditional and platform-friendly]
>> Signed-off-by: Alexandre Courbot <acourbot@xxxxxxxxxx>
>> ---
>> drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_bo.c | 32 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>> drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_bo.h | 20 ++++++++++++++++++++
>> drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_gem.c | 8 +++++++-
>> 3 files changed, 59 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_bo.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_bo.c
>> index b6dc85c614be..0886f47e5244 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_bo.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_bo.c
>> @@ -407,6 +407,8 @@ nouveau_bo_validate(struct nouveau_bo *nvbo, bool interruptible,
>> {
>> int ret;
>>
>> + nouveau_bo_sync_for_device(nvbo);
>> +
>> ret = ttm_bo_validate(&nvbo->bo, &nvbo->placement,
>> interruptible, no_wait_gpu);
>> if (ret)
>> @@ -487,6 +489,36 @@ nouveau_bo_invalidate_caches(struct ttm_bo_device *bdev, uint32_t flags)
>> return 0;
>> }
>>
>> +#ifdef NOUVEAU_NEED_CACHE_SYNC
>
> I don't like this ifdef at all. I know calling this functions will add a
> little overhead to x86 where it isn't strictly required, but I think
> it's negligible.
>
> When I looked at them the dma_sync_single_for_[device|cpu] functions
> which are called here map out to just a drain of the PCI store buffer on
> x86, which should be fast enough to be done unconditionally. They won't
> so any time-consuming cache synchronization on PCI coherent arches.
If Ben agrees with it I am also perfectly fine with getting rid of this #ifdef.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-tegra" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
