Hi On Wed, Apr 23, 2014 at 10:40 AM, Daniel Vetter <daniel@xxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Wed, Apr 23, 2014 at 09:17:16AM +0200, Thierry Reding wrote: >> On second thought, wouldn't this be better located in drm_stub.c? It >> isn't really related to the IOCTL code except that one of the IOCTLs now >> uses the information set by this function. Logically I think it belongs >> with the likes of drm_dev_alloc() and drm_dev_register(). > > Yeah makes sense. Tbh the entire split-up of these core drm functions is > still a bit messy, so I don't mind if it's a bit inconsistent really. We > can do the suffling when someone bothers with the kerneldoc for all of > them and pulls it into the drm docbook. During drm_dev_*() cleanup, I tried to keep the following structure: drm_drv.c: global drm-module setup drm_stub.c: drm_device allocation, registration and lifetime management drm_fops.c: reference-implementation of the drm file_operations The only thing that's wrongly placed is ioctl handling (which somehow ended up in drm_drv.c instead of drm_fops.c). drm_stub.c is where all the generic and mandatory DRM device handling is placed so yeah, I'd put the set_unique() there. Thanks David -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-tegra" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
