On Tue, Mar 18, 2014 at 12:38:42PM +0100, Takashi Iwai wrote: > Mark Brown wrote: > > On Tue, Mar 18, 2014 at 12:20:00PM +0100, Takashi Iwai wrote: > > > regmap deploys the spinlock for the protection when set up in fast_io > > > mode. But some places are still left with possible sleep in the lock, > > > typically allocating memory with GFP_KERNEL. This patch fixes these > > > calls by moving the allocations out of the lock. > > You should have split these two unrelated changes into two patches. > You're suggesting to split the patch to fix for regmap_bulk_write() > and regmap_register_patch()? I don't mind to split, but basically > both are the very same bug, and the solution is very same, too. Yes (especially given that the considerations for patch are a bit different). > > I already have a fix for the cache sync in my tree locally which I will > > test just a soon as I fix whatever broke the -next build for me. > I don't know why you're talking about the build fix... I can't exactly test my code if the underlying kernel won't even compile.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
