Re: A question about DT support for soc_camera

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Jan 16, 2014 at 3:04 PM, Guennadi Liakhovetski
<g.liakhovetski@xxxxxx> wrote:
> Hi Bryan,
>
> On Wed, 15 Jan 2014, Bryan Wu wrote:
>
>> Hi Guennadi,
>>
>> I'm working on upstream our Tegra soc_camera host driver. But found
>> the soc_camera framework is not fully supporting Device Tree probing,
>> am I wrong about that?
>
> Mostly correct, yes, currently soc-camera doesn't support device-tree
> probing.
>
>> While in upstream Tegra kernel, we only support
>> DT probing and there is no board files.
>>
>> Current soc_camera framework needs to put soc_camera_link information
>> in a board file and build up soc-camera-pdrv platform_device, then
>> finally register this soc-camera-pdrv platform_device.
>>
>> For the host driver, we can do DT probing but for i2c soc_camera
>> sensor driver I failed to find any DT probing in upstream kernel. So
>> how to do that without an board file but use DT for this whole thing?
>>
>> Can we use DT like this?
>> DTB file will pass those I2C, clock, regulator, GPIO information to
>> host driver. During host driver DT probing, we dynamically create
>> soc-camera-pdrv platform_device and soc_camera_link then register
>> them. Then the rest of the thing should be the same as None-DT
>> probing.
>
> I've worked on soc-camera DT in the past, this might be the last published
> version
>
> http://marc.info/?l=linux-sh&m=134875489304837&w=1
>
> As you see, it's quite old. Since then a few things happened. Device tree
> support has been added to V4L2 (see
> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/media/video-interfaces.txt and other
> files in that directory for examples), it is based on asynchronous
> probing, which is also supported by the soc-camera core and some its
> host drivers (e.g.
>
> commit 4dbfd040757b8bf22f4ac17e80b39c068061a16c
> Author: Guennadi Liakhovetski <g.liakhovetski@xxxxxx>
> Date:   Tue Jul 30 02:59:49 2013 -0300
>
>     [media] V4L2: mx3_camera: add support for asynchronous subdevice registration
>
> ). So, what you should do, is add asynchronous probing support to your
> driver, add DT support to the soc-camera core, add it to your drivers.
> Also see drivers/media/v4l2-core/v4l2-of.c for helper functions, you
> should be using.
>

Great, Guennadi. I will start to help to add DT for soc-camera.

But one more question is how to add DT support for soc-camera sensor
driver? For sensor driver, we need pass those regulator/gpio/clock
information for power on/off operations. If we add I2C device node in
DTS file to pass those settings to driver, driver will be
automatically loaded and start to probing. But I think loading
soc_camera sensor driver should be done by soc_camera core code during
host driver registering. Any suggestions to solve this problem?

Thanks,
-Bryan
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-tegra" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux ARM MSM]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux