On Thu, Dec 19, 2013 at 12:20:01PM -0700, Stephen Warren wrote:
> On 12/19/2013 10:59 AM, Greg KH wrote:
> > On Thu, Dec 19, 2013 at 05:54:30PM +0200, Peter De Schrijver wrote:
>
> >> + pr_info("Tegra Revision: %s SKU: %d CPU Process: %d Core Process: %d\n",
> >> + tegra_revision_name[sku_info->revision],
> >> + sku_info->sku_id, sku_info->cpu_process_id,
> >> + sku_info->core_process_id);
> >
> > Why pollute the kernel log with this type of thing? Who really needs
> > it?
>
> We already print this; I guess this series is just moving where that
> happens. It has proved useful to me in the past so I know which chip rev
> I'm using, but I guess if this all gets exported to sysfs somewhere else
> in this series, I could just go read those files in the future...
I don't see this being exported anywhere else, or at least, if it is, it
sure isn't being documented...
greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-tegra" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
