On 12/19/2013 02:05 AM, Dong Aisheng wrote: > On Thu, Dec 19, 2013 at 7:00 AM, Stephen Warren <swarren@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> On 12/18/2013 03:27 PM, Stephen Warren wrote: >>> From: Stephen Warren <swarren@xxxxxxxxxx> >>> >>> In mmc_do_calc_max_discard(), if only a single erase block can be >>> discarded within the host controller's timeout, don't allow discard >>> operations at all. >>> >>> Previously, the code allowed sector-at-a-time discard (rather than >>> erase-block-at-a-time), which was chronically slow. >>> >>> Without this patch, on the NVIDIA Tegra Cardhu board, the loops result >>> in qty == 1, which is immediately returned. This causes discard to >>> operate a single sector at a time, which is chronically slow. With this >>> patch in place, discard operates a single erase block at a time, which >>> is reasonably fast. >> >> Alternatively, is the real fix a revert of e056a1b5b67b "mmc: queue: let >> host controllers specify maximum discard timeout", followed by: >> >>> diff --git a/drivers/mmc/core/core.c b/drivers/mmc/core/core.c >>> index 050eb262485c..35c5b5d86c99 100644 >>> --- a/drivers/mmc/core/core.c >>> +++ b/drivers/mmc/core/core.c >>> @@ -1950,7 +1950,6 @@ static int mmc_do_erase(struct mmc_card *card, unsigned int from, >>> cmd.opcode = MMC_ERASE; >>> cmd.arg = arg; >>> cmd.flags = MMC_RSP_SPI_R1B | MMC_RSP_R1B | MMC_CMD_AC; >>> - cmd.cmd_timeout_ms = mmc_erase_timeout(card, arg, qty); >>> err = mmc_wait_for_cmd(card->host, &cmd, 0); >>> if (err) { >>> pr_err("mmc_erase: erase error %d, status %#x\n", >>> @@ -1962,7 +1961,7 @@ static int mmc_do_erase(struct mmc_card *card, unsigned int from, >>> if (mmc_host_is_spi(card->host)) >>> goto out; >>> >>> - timeout = jiffies + msecs_to_jiffies(MMC_CORE_TIMEOUT_MS); >>> + timeout = jiffies + msecs_to_jiffies(mmc_erase_timeout(card, arg, qty)); >>> do { >>> memset(&cmd, 0, sizeof(struct mmc_command)); >>> cmd.opcode = MMC_SEND_STATUS; >> >> That certainly also seems to solve the problem on my board... > > Is the change you mean here only include above 3 lines changes? > If yes, it's strange to me how does this solve your issue? > It actually does not change the max_discard_to/max_discard_bytes. > It still discards only one sector one time if it does as before.... It's a revert of the patch which introduced max_discard_to, so all that logic goes away completely, *then* the 3 lines above, which move the timeout away from command submission (which is what I believe is implemented by the controller's timeout HW) and to the CMD13 polling operation (where we can implement whatever timeout we want, in the kernel). -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-tegra" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html