On 17 December 2013 16:22, bilhuang <bilhuang@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Tegra20 DVFS is a little bit complicated due to the fact that we can't scale > VDD_CPU directly, there are constraints or relationship to other power rails > so I don't think it is a good idea to use generic cpufreq-cpu0 driver if > we're going to support voltage scaling. But why can't we handle that in a CPU specific regulator code? -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-tegra" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
