On 12/02/2013 05:48 PM, Alexandre Courbot wrote: > On Tue, Nov 26, 2013 at 9:10 AM, Olof Johansson <olof@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> On Sun, Nov 24, 2013 at 03:30:45PM +0900, Alexandre Courbot wrote: >>> New rebase that should be ready-to-apply on the latest Tegra tree. The last >>> remaining blocker is Russell's approval for this series and it is my hope to >>> obtain it with this version. >>> >>> There has been quite some debate around this series, notably about the SMC >>> calling conventions and whether the firmware interface should be moved out of >>> arch/arm. I hope that all the questions have been answered and that we can move >>> forward with this series that enables NVIDIA-branded retail Tegra devices to run >>> mainline. >>> >>> Changes since v10: >>> - Rebased on top of more recent sources since some files have been renamed in >>> mach-tegra. >>> - Gave a final proof-read and extensive testing. >>> >>> Alexandre Courbot (7): >>> ARM: add basic support for Trusted Foundations >>> of: add vendor prefix for Trusted Logic Mobility >>> of: add Trusted Foundations bindings documentation >>> ARM: tegra: add support for Trusted Foundations >>> ARM: tegra: split setting of CPU reset handler >>> ARM: tegra: set CPU reset handler using firmware >>> ARM: tegra: support Trusted Foundations by default >> >> Ok, this looks good to me. Russell, do you want the first patch in your >> tree or are you ok with acking that and we can take everything through >> arm-soc? >> >> The alternative is that we can have Stephen provide a stable branch with >> the first patch on it and we both merge that, then the rest goes on top >> of that through arm-soc. > > Russell, ping? Russell, are you OK with this series? If you could ack patch 1, that would be great. If I don't hear otherwise by Friday, I think the best thing is to merge the whole series through the Tegra tree, although I'll structure it so that patch 1 can be merged into other branches separately if needed. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-tegra" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
