On Tue, Nov 26, 2013 at 09:31:25AM -0700, Stephen Warren wrote: > ... so, I thought you were OK with that one issue. Were there other > issues you didn't mention before? Probably not but I'd need to reread it, I don't think I got that much further than noticing that there weren't any clock changes (the fact that the clock dependency was getting added in a DMA series set off alarm bells). To be honest given the number of revisions that seem to be required I'd been expecting to see a respin of the series, the ASoC generic DMA changes did need a respin before they can be merged and I do want to get them into the ASoC tree.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
