(Russell, a question for you at the bottom) On 11/13/2013 10:57 AM, Olof Johansson wrote: > On Tue, Nov 12, 2013 at 6:14 PM, Alex Courbot <acourbot@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> On 11/13/2013 05:38 AM, Olof Johansson wrote: ... >>> I pinged Russell, and he brought up the fact that there were earlier >>> requests to move it to drivers/firmware. It would make sense to try to >>> get that done before merging, especially if you anticipate someone >>> using TF on 64-bit platforms. >> >> IIRC when we discussed this point your last comment was as follows: > > Touche. :) Thanks for the reminder. > >> On Tue, Oct 29, 2013 at 6:55 AM, Olof Johansson <olof@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>> I think we can probably merge this under arch/arm now, and when we >>> figure out what needs to be common with ARM64 we can move it out to a >>> good location. It might be that mostly just a header file with ABI >>> conventions needs to be shared, not actual implementation, for >>> example. >> >> So I thought we agreed on that. If in the end we prefer to move the ARM >> firmware interface into drivers/firmware, I'm fine with that too (Tomasz >> also confirmed he would be ok with it) but I wonder if that would not be >> somehow premature. ... > Well, as I already said I'm ok with things going into arch/arm to > start with, as long as Russell is. ... Russell, the patch Alex sent to move firmware_ops into drivers/firmware was rejected, so I don't think we can update this series to move the code there instead. So, are you OK with merging this series as-is, in arch/arm/firmware? If you could ack the patch/series to indicate that, it would be awesome. Thanks. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-tegra" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
