On Mon, 2013-11-18 at 10:42 -0700, Stephen Warren wrote: > On 11/18/2013 02:18 AM, Shevchenko, Andriy wrote: > > On Fri, 2013-11-15 at 13:01 -0800, Dan Williams wrote: > >> On Fri, Nov 15, 2013 at 12:54 PM, Stephen Warren <swarren@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > >>> Eventually, all drivers should be converted to this new API, the old API > >>> removed, and the new API renamed to the more desirable name. > > > > I really would like to see more sensible and shorter names for the API > > functions. > > I'm not sure if you're suggesting that you: > > a) Really want to API renaming I mention above to happen at some time. > > b) We need to pick a better name now, for the new API this patch > introduces. If so, do you have any better suggestion? Sooner better, I think. Now only what I can propose is to change dma_slave_request_channel_or_err() to dma_slave_request_chan(). In any way the dma_slave_request_* API is quite new and we, as far as I understood, will come when the main request function will always return channel or error. -- Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Intel Finland Oy -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-tegra" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
