On 11/13/2013 01:49 PM, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 13, 2013 at 01:13:06PM -0700, Stephen Warren wrote:
>> On 11/13/2013 12:07 PM, Mark Brown wrote:
>
>>> This isn't really regulator specific - it's something that
>>> applies in general to things implementing deferred probing - so
>>> we ought to have a generic "we know if devices can appear later
>>> or not" flag that subsystems can check.
>
>> I guess I misunderstand then, since given that modules exist,
>> wouldn't that flag always be true?
>
> No, with DT you can say that if there is no DT binding configuring
> a given thing (clock, regulator, GPIO or whatever) then no amount
> of module loading will ever cause it to appear - this is what the
> flag in question controls.
But we do have a binding for regulators, so wouldn't that flag always
be true?
Perhaps you can suggest a name for the flag, and a specific set of
conditions when it will have specific values. That might help me
understand what you mean.
Are you confusing having a binding (schema definition) with having DT
content ("foo-supply" property)?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-tegra" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
