Re: [PATCH 1/2] ARM: tegra: Correct Tegra30 SMMU register map

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 11/06/2013 08:58 PM, Mark Zhang wrote:
> Correct Tegra30 SMMU register map.

Some more explanation is required here re: why this layout is more
correct than what's there.

Do you need to edit the reg property in Tegra30's memory-controller node
too; that's what all these reg ranges are interleaved with, so
presumably if there was a mistake in the SMMU ranges, there's the
equivalent inverse mistake in the MC's ranges?

The DT binding for nvidia,tegra30-smmu states that reg should include
precisely 3 entries. This patch no longer conforms to that. The binding
needs to be re-written to explain the interleaving issue, and say that
an arbitrary number of ranges may be provided. The same issue exists in
the nvidia,tegra30-mc DT binding.

I think I'm beginning to regret separating out the MC and SMMU into
separate DT nodes:-(
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-tegra" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux ARM MSM]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux