Hi Peter,
> @@ -1682,17 +1664,15 @@ struct clk *tegra_clk_register_pllc(const char *name, const char *parent_name,
> struct clk *tegra_clk_register_plle_tegra114(const char *name,
> const char *parent_name,
> void __iomem *clk_base, unsigned long flags,
> - unsigned long fixed_rate,
> struct tegra_clk_pll_params *pll_params,
> - struct tegra_clk_pll_freq_table *freq_table,
> spinlock_t *lock)
> {
> struct tegra_clk_pll *pll;
> struct clk *clk;
> u32 val, val_aux;
>
> - pll = _tegra_init_pll(clk_base, NULL, fixed_rate, pll_params,
> - TEGRA_PLL_HAS_LOCK_ENABLE, freq_table, lock);
> + pll_params->flags = TEGRA_PLL_HAS_LOCK_ENABLE;
Why are we just overwriting the flags? We pass in flags here:
> @@ -661,6 +685,9 @@ static struct tegra_clk_pll_params pll_e_params = {
> .lock_enable_bit_idx = PLLE_MISC_LOCK_ENABLE,
> .lock_delay = 300,
> .div_nmp = &plle_nmp,
> + .freq_table = pll_e_freq_table,
> + .flags = TEGRA_PLL_FIXED,
TEGRA_PLL_FIXED doesn't actually make a difference in the
plle_tegra114 case, but it would be nice to be correct about setting
it.
Thanks,
Andrew
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-tegra" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
