On 09/03/2013 08:31 PM, Alex Courbot wrote: > On 09/04/2013 03:42 AM, Stephen Warren wrote: >> On 08/29/2013 03:57 AM, Alexandre Courbot wrote: >>> New version revised according to comments received for v3. Hopefully >>> it will be good enough to be merged. >> >> Aside from the small issue in patch 1/5, the series, >> Reviewed-by: Stephen Warren <swarren@xxxxxxxxxx> > > Thanks! I have adressed the issues you mentioned and will submit v5 > soon. Despite the fact this adds some non-Tegra stuff, will you be able > to take it into your tree, or should I ask someone else? I would like to see an ack from the core ARM maintainer (Russell) on patch 1/5 (also CC'ing arm-soc maintainers for their opinion). If I get that, I think it makes sense to take the series through the Tegra tree. I can always create a stable branch for patch 1/5 if needed to resolve conflicts elsewhere (e.g. Russell's trees or arm-soc) and/or allow other people to build on top of that patch. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-tegra" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
