On 08/26/2013 01:47 AM, Thierry Reding wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 23, 2013 at 01:05:11PM -0600, Stephen Warren wrote:
>> On 08/22/2013 09:46 PM, Penny Chiu wrote:
>>> Add the Tegra124 chip support to cbootimage. User can use "-t124" as
>>> option to parse .cfg and generate BCT/image for Tegra124.
>>
>> This looks fine to me at a quick glance. Just one small comment below:
>>
>>> diff --git a/src/cbootimage.c b/src/cbootimage.c
>>
>>> printf("Usage: cbootimage [options] configfile imagename\n");
>>> printf(" options:\n");
>>> - printf(" -h, --help, -? Display this message.\n");
>>> - printf(" -d, --debug Output debugging information.\n");
>>> - printf(" -gbct Generate the new bct file.\n");
>>> - printf(" -o<ODM_DATA> Specify the odm_data(in hex).\n");
>>> - printf(" [-t20|-t30|-t114] Select one of the possible target devices,\n");
>>> - printf(" -t20 if unspecified.\n");
>>> - printf(" configfile File with configuration information\n");
>>> - printf(" imagename Output image name\n");
>>> + printf(" -h, --help, -? Display this message.\n");
>>> + printf(" -d, --debug Output debugging information.\n");
>>> + printf(" -gbct Generate the new bct file.\n");
>>> + printf(" -o<ODM_DATA> Specify the odm_data(in hex).\n");
>>> + printf(" [-t20|-t30|-t114|-t124] Select one of the possible target devices,\n");
>>> + printf(" -t20 if unspecified.\n");
>>> + printf(" configfile File with configuration information\n");
>>> + printf(" imagename Output image name\n");
>>> }
>>
>> To avoid continually re-formatting that text when adding new SoCs, why
>> not start the description of the -tNN options on a separate line, and
>> leave the indentation as-is for all the unmodified lines. i.e.:
>>
>>>> + printf(" [-t20|-t30|-t114|-t124]\n");
>>>> + printf(" Select one of the possible target devices,\n");
>>>> + printf(" -t20 if unspecified.\n");
>
> Perhaps in the long run it would be better to turn this into something
> like:
>
> printf(" -t, --target SOC Select target device. Must be one of:\n");
> printf(" 20, 30, 114, 124 (default: 20)\n");
I don't like the idea of "--target 20", since "20" isn't an SoC name;
it's "tegra20" or just perhaps "t20".
I'd be fine with a patch that allowed "-SOC" or "--target SOC", with
SOC being "t20", "t30", ...
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-tegra" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
