On 08/19/2013 02:16 PM, Thierry Reding wrote: > On Thu, Aug 15, 2013 at 09:21:53AM -0600, Stephen Warren wrote: >> On 08/15/2013 04:34 AM, Thierry Reding wrote: >>> On Wed, Aug 14, 2013 at 03:43:40PM -0600, Stephen Warren >>> wrote: >>>> On 08/13/2013 05:12 AM, Thierry Reding wrote: >>>>> Implement the platform driver's .remove() callback to free >>>>> all resources allocated during driver setup and call >>>>> pci_common_exit() to cleanup ARM specific datastructures. >>>>> Unmap the fixed PCI I/O mapping by calling the new >>>>> pci_iounmap_io() function in the new .teardown() callback. >>>>> >>>>> Finally, no longer set the .suppress_bind_attrs field to >>>>> true to allow the driver to unbind from a device. >>>> >>>>> +static int tegra_pcie_remove(struct platform_device *pdev) >>>>> +{ + struct tegra_pcie *pcie = platform_get_drvdata(pdev); >>>>> + struct tegra_pcie_bus *bus, *tmp; + int err; + + >>>>> pci_common_exit(&pcie->sys); + + >>>>> list_for_each_entry_safe(bus, tmp, &pcie->busses, list) { + >>>>> vunmap(bus->area->addr); + kfree(bus); + } + + if >>>>> (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PCI_MSI)) { + err = >>>>> tegra_pcie_disable_msi(pcie); + if (err < 0) + return >>>>> err; + } >>>> >>>> Wouldn't it make sense to do that as early as possible in >>>> the function, to make sure that no MSI accidentally fires >>>> after some of the cleanup has already happened? >>> >>> I don't think that's strictly necessary in this case. After >>> the call to pci_common_exit() there are no PCI devices left, >>> there's not even a bus left. All MSI users should have cleaned >>> up after themselves. >>> >>> Given that I thought it more useful to mirror the setup done >>> in .probe() to make it clearer what's being undone (and >>> potentially what's missing). >> >> That makes sense SW-wise, but what about mis-behaving HW that >> triggers an MSI even when it's been told not to? I assume that >> tegra_pcie_disable_msi() unrequests the IRQ, hence solves that >> problem, if done early enough. > > To be honest, I'm not sure about the side-effects that this will > have. tegra_pcie_disable_msi() does quite a bit more than just > masking the interrupts. It also completely removes the IRQ domain > that provides the MSI interrupts. While I haven't tried it yet I > can imagine that it will cause crashes at a later point when > drivers want to disable MSI on a device and the IRQ domain having > vanished from underneath. Surely by the time the PCIe controller device has been remove()d then all devices for PCIe "client" devices have also been removed. But I guess the problem is if the controller is added back, yet the IRQ resources aren't re-parsed under the new IRQ domain? Still, that seems like an unrelated issue to exactly where the MSI IRQ domain gets cleaned up in the host controller's remove(). -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-tegra" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html