On Mon, Aug 19, 2013 at 02:15:39PM +0200, Julia Lawall wrote: > > > On Mon, 19 Aug 2013, Thierry Reding wrote: > > > On Mon, Aug 19, 2013 at 02:07:54PM +0200, Julia Lawall wrote: > > > > > > > > > On Mon, 19 Aug 2013, Thierry Reding wrote: > > > > > > > On Mon, Aug 19, 2013 at 01:20:35PM +0200, Julia Lawall wrote: > > > > > From: Julia Lawall <Julia.Lawall@xxxxxxx> > > > > > > > > > > Use devm_ioremap_resource instead of devm_request_and_ioremap. > > > > > > > > > > This was done using the semantic patch > > > > > scripts/coccinelle/api/devm_ioremap_resource.cocci > > > > > > > > > > Error-handling code was manually removed from the associated calls to > > > > > platform_get_resource. > > > > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Julia Lawall <Julia.Lawall@xxxxxxx> > > > > > > > > > > --- > > > > > The first block of modified code is followed by a call to > > > > > devm_request_mem_region for pcie->cs with no associated ioremap. Should > > > > > ioremap be used in this case as well? > > > > > > > > No. The pcie->cs resource is 256 MiB so it's challenging to map it at > > > > once. Furthermore it requires a non-linear mapping so we do it on > > > > demand. > > > > > > OK, thanks for the explanation. Is the comment, though, a little > > > misleading, since the mapping is not done here? > > > > > > /* request and remap configuration space */ > > > > Yes, that's misleading. Given that it doesn't really add anything useful > > information either, perhaps I should just remove it. > > OK, or maybe something like > > /* request configuration space, but remap later, on demand */ > > To make it clear that something different is intended than the > devm_ioremap_resources that come just before.. Yes, that works for me too. Can you respin the patch with the comment updated and my Acked-by and Tested-by so Bjorn can pick it up? Thierry
Attachment:
pgpfJ07HCEWXt.pgp
Description: PGP signature
