On Thu, Aug 15, 2013 at 6:40 AM, Stephen Warren <swarren@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On 08/12/2013 08:29 PM, Alexandre Courbot wrote:
>> Use a firmware operation to set the CPU reset handler and only resort to
>> doing it ourselves if there is none defined.
>>
>> This supports the booting of secondary CPUs on devices using a TrustZone
>> secure monitor.
>
>> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-tegra/reset.c b/arch/arm/mach-tegra/reset.c
>
>> + err = call_firmware_op(set_cpu_boot_addr, 0, reset_address);
>> + switch (err) {
>> + case -ENOSYS:
>> + tegra_cpu_reset_handler_set(reset_address);
>> + /* pass-through */
>> + case 0:
>> + is_enabled = true;
>> + break;
>> + default:
>> + pr_crit("Cannot set CPU reset handler: %d\n", err);
>> + BUG();
>> + }
>
> Instead of trying and failing, does it make sense to register
> tegra_cpu_reset_handler_set() as the set_cpu_boot_addr firmware op when
> there is no firmware present? That would simplify all call-sites of any
> firmware op.
We discussed that point in v2 already IIRC (that is some time ago).
The reason I did it this way is because I wanted to follow the way
Tomasz was using his interface with Exynos - it seemed appropriate
that all users of an interface use it the same way. But if you prefer
to use a "non-firmware" firmware_ops for Tegra, I have absolutely
nothing against this.
Thanks,
Alex.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-tegra" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
