On Thu, Aug 15, 2013 at 6:38 AM, Stephen Warren <swarren@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On 08/12/2013 08:29 PM, Alexandre Courbot wrote:
>> Register the firmware operations for Trusted Foundations if the device
>> tree indicates it is active on the device.
>
>> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-tegra/firmware.c b/arch/arm/mach-tegra/firmware.c
>
>> +void __init tegra_init_firmware(void)
>> +{
>> + struct device_node *node;
>> +
>> + if (!of_have_populated_dt())
>> + return;
>
> That's never false on Tegra, at least upstream.
Will remove, thanks.
>> + node = of_find_compatible_node(NULL, NULL, "tl,trusted-foundations");
>> + if (node) {
>> + const char *tf_version;
>> + int err;
>> +
>> + err = of_property_read_string(node, "version", &tf_version);
>> + if (err != 0) {
>> + pr_crit("Cannot read Trusted Foundation version: %d\n",
>> + err);
>> + BUG();
>> + } else {
>> + register_trusted_foundations(tf_version);
>> + }
>> + }
>> +}
>
> I think most/all of that function will be common across all SoCs that
> support the TF monitor. I think you want to move the code into
> register_trusted_foundations() (or a function that calls that) in patch 1?
Agreed. If we push the logic a bit further, we should also have some
platform parameters for non-DT users, along with an
of_register_trusted_foundations() for those who prefer DT.
Thanks,
Alex.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-tegra" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
