On 07/23/2013 12:32 PM, Stephen Warren wrote:
On 07/22/2013 07:15 PM, Alex Courbot wrote:
...
Although the patch seems ok to me in its current form, there are two
points for which I still have small doubts:
1) Whether size_t and pointers will have the same size on all platforms.
ptrsize_t?
Do you mean ptrdiff_t? (I cannot find ptrsize_t anywhere in the kernel)
Looking further about the uses of size_t and ptrdiff_t, it seems like
size_t is designed to store the maximum addressable member of an array,
whereas ptrdiff_t is used to store a substraction of two pointers. In
effect, they translate to the unsigned (size_t) and signed (ptrdiff_t)
variants of the same type.
But since here we know that the result of the substraction will always
be positive and potentially big (for devices with memory in the lower
half of the address space) using size_t sounds safer to avoid overflows
and sign-conversion issues (strm->avail_out, where the value of out_len
eventually ends, is an unsigned int).
So point 1) at least seems to be handled correctly with size_t. Point 2)
might still be of concern, but if your uncompressed kernel image ends up
overflowing your addressable memory, I guess you have a bigger problem
to start with. :)
Andrew, do you think you can merge this as-is? Sorry if you are not the
right person to ask, but there is no clear maintainer for this part of
the code and you appear to have handled the latest patches that affect
the same file.
Thanks,
Alex.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-tegra" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
