On Wed, Jun 12, 2013 at 10:11:27AM -0600, Stephen Warren wrote: > On 06/12/2013 09:06 AM, Felipe Balbi wrote: > > On Wed, Jun 05, 2013 at 02:03:03PM -0600, Stephen Warren wrote: > >> From: Manjunath Goudar <manjunath.goudar@xxxxxxxxxx> > >> > >> In order to build a ULPI PHY driver as a module, this symbol > >> needs to be exported. > >> > >> Signed-off-by: Manjunath Goudar <manjunath.goudar@xxxxxxxxxx> > >> [swarren, reworked Manjunath's patches to split them more > >> logically] Signed-off-by: Stephen Warren <swarren@xxxxxxxxxx> > >> Acked-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxx> > > > > This should go straight through Greg: > > All the patches in this series build on top of each-other, so I think > need to be applied in the same branch. Applying this patch in branch A > but the others in branch B will cause the build to fail in branch B if > the driver is built as a module, since ulpi_viewport_access_ops isn't > exported, right? > > And this series is also based on top of all the Tegra driver changes > in your PHY branch, so I believe that is the correct place to apply this. Isn't it the same thing as Greg taking these patches after applying my pull request ? There's way too much outside of my domain here without proper Acks for me to pick it up anyway. -- balbi
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
