On Tue, 2013-06-04 at 06:48 +0800, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > On Monday 03 June 2013, Stephen Warren wrote: > > Was that ifdef completely incorrect before? I can see why the cmp/beq > > might be ifdef'd (although it's not worth it), but I assume the code > > after that beq was intended to run on all chips after Tegra20. The ifdef > > as it was written does something rather different; it prevents any of > > that code from running unless the kernel doesn't have Tegra20 support. > > So, I think that the removal of the ifdef is more of a bug-fix that > > "because we always build with all Tegra SoCs support. Let me know, and > > I'll re-write the commit description to something more accurate... > > The #ifdef was recently changed from #if TEGRA3 to #if !TEGRA2, which support > for TEGRA4 was added. I think this is where it broke. > Yes, exactly. Sorry again for the error code. Joseph -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-tegra" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
