On 05/20/2013 09:35 AM, Rhyland Klein wrote: > On 5/20/2013 11:28 AM, Stephen Warren wrote: >> On 05/20/2013 09:24 AM, Rhyland Klein wrote: >>> On 5/17/2013 7:57 PM, Stephen Warren wrote: >>>> On 04/10/2013 01:51 PM, Rhyland Klein wrote: >>>>> The charger is now represented by a distinct subnode of the tps65090 >>>>> device. Add this node and enable low current charging with it. >>>> >>>> What's the status of the TPS60590 bindings; are they agreed upon by >>>> NVIDIA, TI, and SlimLogic yet? In other words, is this patch still >>>> something I should apply for 3.11, or does it need to be reworked? >>> >>> I haven't seen any discussion with slimlogic or TI about the tps65090. >>> As far as I know the bindings for this driver haven't changed. >>> >>> Laxman, do you think the work on the palmas driver will impact the >>> design of the bindings for the tps65090? >> >> Sorry, perhaps I'm confusing two different chips. If TPS65090 isn't >> Palmas, then ignore my question. In which case, I suppose I should just >> apply your patch then? >> > > I would say yes. The design of having the child node this way was how we > had agreed worked best. The only reason I would see a significant reason > to change this, is if something was decided that all mfd devices should > start to follow some pattern which differed, which would mean changing > existing bindings and therefore is unlikely. OK, I have applied this patch to Tegra's for-3.11/dt branch. I also sent a patch to actually enable the new driver in tegra_defconfig. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-tegra" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
