On 03/13/2013 07:26 PM, Joseph Lo wrote: > On Thu, 2013-03-14 at 01:34 +0800, Stephen Warren wrote: >> On 03/13/2013 12:04 AM, Joseph Lo wrote: >> ... >>> BTW, I want to mention one thing about PMC DT bindings. Because I can't >>> add all of the PMC DT bindings in one time, the PMC is related to too >>> many devices to work for runtime PM and power domain control. And some >>> wake up sources control for deep sleep mode (LP0). They are still under >>> developing for upstream. May I add more bindings for PMC later? >> >> With DT you are supposed to define the complete DT binding for the HW up >> front. There have been some hints that incrementally defining bindings >> will start to get push-back. How hard is it in this case to simply >> define the entire binding right now? >> > There are still two main features for PMC that we need to define > bindings/properties in DT. One is power main the other wake up source. > But we are not there yet. Because I don't have drivers to verify them is > enough or not. If I add all the bindings right now, I believe it will be > modify later. Since the DT is supposed to be a representation of the HW, and not a representation of what a particular driver needs, I'm not sue why you'd need to be able to test a driver before you could design a DT binding. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-tegra" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
