On 03/12/2013 05:40 PM, Andrew Chew wrote:
> We should be defining the PWM nodes with status as "disabled" in the
> chip-specific dtsi file, since we don't know whether specific boards
> will use the PWM or not. This patch fixes the PWM node status for
> Tegra20 and Tegra30.
>
> Also fixed the one user of PWM, which is the Tegra20 medcom-wide board,
> so that PWM is set to "okay" in the board-specific dts file.
I've applied this series to Tegra's for-3.10/dt branch.
> diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/tegra20-medcom-wide.dts b/arch/arm/boot/dts/tegra20-medcom-wide.dts
> + pwm: pwm {
> + status = "okay";
> + }
> +
There's also a syntax error here; there needs to be a ; after the }. I
also fixed this up when I applied it.
BTW, "PATCH 2/2 v4" is more typically written "PATCH V4 2/2". Using "git
format-patch --subject-prefix='PATCH V4'" can help automate that a little.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-tegra" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
