On 03/07/2013 03:46 AM, Joseph Lo wrote:
> On Wed, 2013-03-06 at 02:33 +0800, Stephen Warren wrote:
>> On 03/04/2013 04:40 AM, Joseph Lo wrote:
>>> If the system supports deep sleep mode (i.e. suspend), it should have
>>> the power management configuration for PMC in the DT under the sub-node
>>> of PMC. Different system may have different configurations, it should
>>> be parsed from DT.
>>
>>> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-tegra/pmc.c b/arch/arm/mach-tegra/pmc.c
>>
>>> @@ -143,6 +161,10 @@ static const struct of_device_id matches[] __initconst = {
>>> static void tegra_pmc_parse_dt(void)
>>> {
>>> struct device_node *np;
>>> + u32 prop;
>>> + enum tegra_suspend_mode suspend_mode;
>>> + u32 core_good_time[2] = {0, 0};
>>> + u32 lp0_vec[2] = {0, 0};
>>>
>>> np = of_find_matching_node(NULL, matches);
>>> BUG_ON(!np);
>>
>> This files doesn't look like that; the BUG_ON() isn't present upstream.
>> yet. So, this series depends on some other patches not yet applied. You
>> need to explicitly document your patch dependencies somewhere. Hopefully
>> I can work it out...
>>
> Sorry for that.
>
>> The DT binding documentation patch (5/10) should be squashed into this
>> patch; both document and implement the bindings in the same patch.
>
> IIRC, you asked me to separate the binding documentation and
> implementation into two different patch in internal review. Should I
> squash these two now? (I can do that, just want to confirm.)
I don't remember and can't find the history. I /think/ the DT binding
doc was in the same patch as the change to *.dts, and I'd asked for it
to be separated from that. It's typical to write/edit the DT binding
document in the same patch as the driver changes though. Or sometimes, a
separate patch, but earlier in the sequence than the driver code which
implements it. So yes squash please.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-tegra" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
