On 03/06/2013 04:20 PM, Andrew Chew wrote: >> Subject: [PATCH] clk: tegra: provide dummy cpu car ops >> >> tegra_boot_secondary() relies on some of the car ops. This means having an >> uninitialized tegra_cpu_car_ops will lead to an early boot panic. >> Providing a dummy struct avoids this and makes adding Tegra114 clock >> support in a bisectable way a lot easier. >> >> -- >> >> Stephen, >> >> Should this be a separate patch or should I make this part of new release of >> the Tegra114 clock series? I'm not sure if I answered this. Peter, I intend to apply this patch to a branch right before the CCF, so there's no explicit need to include it in the series, although if you do, that's fine. >> diff --git a/drivers/clk/tegra/clk.c b/drivers/clk/tegra/clk.c index >> /* Global data of Tegra CPU CAR ops */ >> -struct tegra_cpu_car_ops *tegra_cpu_car_ops; > > Sorry for bringing this up so late... > Shouldn't the above be "struct tegra_cpu_car_ops tegra_cpu_car_ops;"? > >> +static struct tegra_cpu_car_ops *dummy_car_ops; struct >> +tegra_cpu_car_ops *tegra_cpu_car_ops = &dummy_car_ops; No, the value is used as a pointer in include/linux/clk/tegra.h, e.g.: tegra_cpu_car_ops->wait_for_reset(cpu); -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-tegra" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html