On 02/18/2013 10:31 PM, Shawn Guo wrote: > On Thu, Feb 14, 2013 at 10:54:28AM -0700, Stephen Warren wrote: >> On 02/13/2013 11:38 PM, Hiroshi Doyu wrote: >>> To replace magic number in "clocks = <&tegra_car 28>;" >> >> I like the concept here; I was thinking about doing this today, but you >> beat me to it:-) Feel free to create the Tegra30 header too, and modify >> all the *.dts* files. >> >> To address other comments in this thread: Yes, I think that we will want >> to modify the clock driver to include this header to avoid >> duplication/errors (that will require adjusting Linux's include path), >> and also remove the list of IDs from the binding document; it can just >> refer the the new header by name and cause the header to *be* part of >> the binding document. > > I like it, since doing so will help us hijack kernel to have dts stay > in the tree rather than going to a separate repository :) Well, at least the header files would need to stay in the kernel. The .txt binding documentation wouldn't have to though. I guess this is a good argument for not putting these header files into Documentation/devicetree/bindings, and adding that to the include path, but rather putting the headers somewhere else. > Seriously, is maintaining dts in a separate repository still a plan? > If yes, we will have duplication problem someday anyway. > > For reason of it, I vote for having dts stay in the kernel tree. > > Shawn > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-tegra" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
