On 02/08/2013 06:05 PM, Joe Perches wrote: > On Fri, 2013-02-08 at 17:47 -0700, Stephen Warren wrote: >> On 02/08/2013 05:40 PM, Joe Perches wrote: >>> On Fri, 2013-02-08 at 13:04 -0700, Stephen Warren wrote: >>>> (?<!in)tegra >>> >>> This doesn't work well. It matches too many >>> words like integral. >> >> Hmmm. That's exactly what the (?<!in) negative look-behind assertion is >> attempting to avoid. It works fine here. Is there some dependency on >> Perl version or something? My Perl version is v5.14.2. > > Integral matches > > I don't see any issue with using a leading \b Oh right, it's a capitalization issue; I only tested with "integral" not "Integral". The problem with \btegra is that it wouldn't match _tegra, which would be useful. Perhaps a custom almost-equivalent (?i)[^a-z]tegra would work? -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-tegra" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
