On 01/16/2013 10:03 PM, Hiroshi Doyu wrote: > Stephen Warren <swarren@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote @ Wed, 16 Jan 2013 21:11:24 +0100: > >>>> +static int clk_frac_div_set_rate(struct clk_hw *hw, unsigned long rate, >>>> + unsigned long parent_rate) >>>> +{ >>>> + struct tegra_clk_frac_div *divider = to_clk_frac_div(hw); >>>> + int div; >>>> + unsigned long flags = 0; >>> >>> nit, is "flags" not needed to initialize here? >> >> It avoids a compiler warning; the compiler doesn't that the if condition >> that guards the path that uses flags is the same condition as the path >> that initializes it. Or, it may be related to the fact that >> spin_lock_irqsave() writes to the value through a pointer parameter, and >> the compiler doesn't know it's an out-only parameter. > > It might be better to append the special comment /* GCC */[1] on that line. > > [1] https://lwn.net/Articles/529954/ I note that patch hasn't actually been merged though, so I think I'll avoid doing that for now. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-tegra" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html