On Tuesday 18 December 2012 11:48 AM, Prashant Gaikwad wrote:
On Tuesday 18 December 2012 03:17 AM, Stephen Warren wrote:
On 12/17/2012 05:08 AM, Laxman Dewangan wrote:
Add OF_DEV_AUXDATA for high speed uart controller driver for
Tegra20/Tegra30 board dt files.
Set the parent clock of uart controller to PLLP.
diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-tegra/board-dt-tegra20.c b/arch/arm/mach-tegra/board-dt-tegra20.c
@@ -94,6 +94,11 @@ struct of_dev_auxdata tegra20_auxdata_lookup[] __initdata = {
+ OF_DEV_AUXDATA("nvidia,tegra20-hsuart", 0x70006000, "tegra-uart.0", NULL),
+ OF_DEV_AUXDATA("nvidia,tegra20-hsuart", 0x70006040, "tegra-uart.1", NULL),
+ OF_DEV_AUXDATA("nvidia,tegra20-hsuart", 0x70006200, "tegra-uart.2", NULL),
+ OF_DEV_AUXDATA("nvidia,tegra20-hsuart", 0x70006300, "tegra-uart.3", NULL),
+ OF_DEV_AUXDATA("nvidia,tegra20-hsuart", 0x70006400, "tegra-uart.4", NULL),
Instead, can we simply get the clocks from device tree? Prashant, how
much effort will that be once your clock patches are checked in, or is
it already part of those patches?
It is not part of rework patches, but I will send a patch for it
immediately after those patches are accepted upstream.
@@ -106,7 +111,10 @@ struct of_dev_auxdata tegra20_auxdata_lookup[] __initdata = {
static __initdata struct tegra_clk_init_table tegra_dt_clk_init_table[] = {
/* name parent rate enabled */
{ "uarta", "pll_p", 216000000, true },
+ { "uartb", "pll_p", 216000000, false },
+ { "uartc", "pll_p", 216000000, false },
{ "uartd", "pll_p", 216000000, true },
+ { "uarte", "pll_p", 216000000, false },
Prashant's clock patches remove this table. Please work with him to work
out how to deal with that.
Laxman,
If you want I can include these entries in current tables.
No issue, you can add this in your change.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-tegra" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
