On Thu, Nov 22, 2012 at 11:06 AM, Mark Brown <broonie@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Thu, Nov 22, 2012 at 11:01:34AM +0900, Alexandre Courbot wrote: > >> The thing I don't understand here is why would anyone want power >> sequences without the DT representation. Guys, that's the whole point! :) > >> If we are to implement things into drivers, then callback functions >> are going to serve us just as well - even better, for they are more >> flexible. All we need to do is define a dedicated ops structure and >> have the driver plug the right callback functions depending on the >> "compatible" property of the DT device node. We don't need a framework >> for that. > > It allows drivers (both board drivers and actual drivers) to write these > things in a semi-scripted form instead of having to open code everything > each time, it'd save a bunch of tedious stuff with resource requesting > for example. Mmm, I overlooked that point - that's fair enough. Guess I should remove all DT support and stress that point in the documentation. Then maybe we'll have a deal. Alex. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-tegra" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
